7 Comments
User's avatar
RayDarby's avatar

No one uses 180 minus age to predict max HR. It's 220 minus age (225 for females). 180 was never a part of the equation

Herb Reeves's avatar

Just to clarify Ray, 180 - your age is for determining your optimal aerobic heart rate, not your max heart rate.

RayDarby's avatar

So it aligns with anaerobic threshold?

Herb Reeves's avatar

No, it’s supposed to be mid to upper Zone 2

Rational Wellness's avatar

This is awesome! Thanks for providing such clear and helpful information, more people should hear about it. We’re creating a page dedicated to wellness and physiology, so be sure to check it out!

Breath Runner's avatar

There is another way… 😉

Japanese Spirit of Harmony: 和魂's avatar

Thank you for the great article. I am in my early 50s, and I’ve been training with the Maffetone Method to build my base for next season. But I’ve found it nearly impossible to keep my HR in the zone, especially since I usually run on hilly routes. I’ve ended up running at whatever pace feels comfortable—exactly what you’ve proposed as MVP! This was a very reassuring read.